Jump to content

Corruption and the Voter's Decision Experimental Evidence from Brazil


Recommended Posts

bd0e450a227fc31db0e600eebc248776.webp
Miguel F. P. de Figueiredo, "Corruption and the Voter's Decision: Experimental Evidence from Brazil "
English | ISBN: 1009499742 | 2025 | 75 pages | PDF | 4 MB
Despite voters' distaste for corruption, corrupt politicians frequently get reelected. This Element provides a framework for understanding when corrupt politicians are reelected. One unexplored source of electoral accountability is court rulings on candidate malfeasance, which are increasingly determining politicians' electoral prospects. The findings suggest that (1) low-income voters - in contrast to higher-income voters - are responsive to such rulings. Unlike earlier studies, we explore multiple trade-offs voters weigh when confronting corrupt candidates, including the candidate's party, policy positions, and personal attributes. The results also surprisingly show (2) low-income voters, like higher-income voters, weigh corruption allegations and policy positions similarly, and are slightly more responsive to candidate attributes. Moreover, irrespective of voter income, (3) party labels insulate candidates from corruption, and (4) candidate attributes like gender have little effect. The results have implications for when voters punish corrupt politicians, the success of anti-corruption campaigns, and the design and legitimacy of electoral institutions.

Read more

423b519448d4e936894130c701f35288.jpg

RapidGator
https://rg.to/file/6e6e286ad49f4dd231ecc17fe03db245/u62wj.7z.html
TakeFile
https://takefile.link/mool8i5rxz1s/u62wj.7z.html
Fileaxa
https://fileaxa.com/bf25wc8ewvrv/u62wj.7z
Fikper
https://fikper.com/5LPHyokHfG/u62wj.7z.html


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...