Jump to content

Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning


Recommended Posts

b60e5e8e1c4d54fc65c693a88b08b0d3.webp
David Schultz, "Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning"
English | ISBN: 1839103124 | 2022 | 200 pages | PDF | 3 MB
Precedent is an important tool of judicial decision making and reasoning in common law systems such as the United States. Instead of having each court decide cases anew, the rule of precedent or stares decisis dictates that similar cases should be decided similarly. Adherence to precedent promotes several values, including stability, reliability, and uniformity, and it also serves to constrain judicial discretion. Yet while adherence to precedent is important, there are some cases where the United States Supreme Court does not follow it when it comes to constitutional reasoning. Over time the US Supreme Court under its different Chief Justices has approached rejection of its own precedent in different ways and at varying rates of reversal. This book examines the role of constitutional precedent in US Supreme Court reasoning.

Read more

423b519448d4e936894130c701f35288.jpg

RapidGator
https://rg.to/file/e1f6037034febc815582f5b23edbe0bd/y6di8.7z.html
TakeFile
https://takefile.link/1rngjc526fp5/y6di8.7z.html
Fileaxa
https://fileaxa.com/tvn8qrj6jwms/y6di8.7z
Fikper
https://fikper.com/3hcmlHu3jl/y6di8.7z.html


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...